Quote:
Originally posted by JohnKyle@Jun 14 2005, 03:45 AM
Id rather have that than a PS3 thats marked up $300. And about the graphics...PS2's graphics sucked, no one can argue that cuz it's true. But no one hates the PS2 cuz of it.
|
Who says the PS3 is marked up? Sony and Microsoft are loosing money on their consoles. Nintendo is selling them at a low price because the hardware they use is fairly cheap. Nintendo is probably the only company loosing money
Quote:
|
Do you get what I'm saying? Nintendo fanboys DONT complain about other consoles,
|
Yes they do, all you have done is complained about the xbox 360's faceplates and how the PS3 is overly expensive. You also said, "All just exaggerated words of MS and Sony fanboys." I think you need to realize that you are contradicting yourself.
Quote:
|
There will be new games! Nintendo ISN'T focusing on the old games! Thats extra!
|
Yeah, but who wants to see sequels to Mario and Zelda, when we could be playing completely new games from the other systems. Nintendo could still have other completely new games, but the draw is at the sequels.
Quote:
|
Heres how dumb making fun of the Revolution for having downloadable games sounds: Xbox sucks because It has Xbox Live. Does that make sense? NO!
|
Those are two totally different things. It can be arguable that Xbox Live sucks, but your argument is completely irrelevant and off topic in that Xbox Live is a small component to a system, whereas downloadable games are crucial to the revolution's success. Nintendo revolution could suck just because it is not considered advanced by todays standards, not because of the downloadable games being old.
Quote:
|
Nintendo is a huge company. And it WONT die! OK?
|
Have you ever heard of Enron buddy? What about the great fall of Sega?
Quote:
|
do you actually think Nintendo will vanish from existance owning 95% of the handheld market?
|
Yes, it very well could. Not that it could vanish instantly, but with the growth of the PSP as the handheld media standard and the library of games growing for it, it could easily surpass the DS within the next two years.
Quote:
|
Don't forget, (wherever you guys are) Your not in Japan, and what video game company controlls the market there whos population laughs at ours? Nintendo.
|
Obviously we are not in Japan, but who cares? Just because Nintendo has control over a large portion of Japan does not mean it is successful here. Pretty soon the videogame industry will balance itself out and the dominance it has in Japan will not matter.
Quote:
|
They are far from dying, and you guy's excessive rambling won't speed up the process. Thats the truth.
|
So what if they are not far from dying? That doesn't mean Nintendo will lose most of its fanbase and it's loyal customers. Our rambling wont speed up the process, it's sole purpose is for educating the fanboys who would die for their own company. You have to think straight and realize that videogames are anybody's business, one year Microsoft might be dominating and one year Nintendo might. Right now the odds are not in favor of Nintendo.