Quote:
Originally posted by mendel+Sep 4 2006, 03:42 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (mendel @ Sep 4 2006, 03:42 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--64705@Sep 4 2006, 11:29 AM
The e6600 is much cheaper.
|
seriously?
and wait
the 6200 is even more cheaper B)
[/b][/quote]
Well it probably would be if an e6200 existed, you arse.
There's not that much difference between the e6600 and e6700, and therefore the e6600 is the better bang for buck.