I have to agree with NXS here. There is no logic at all in making someone pay for a crime that a criminal trial couldn't prove him guilty of. How can you be liable for wrongful death and battery when it couldn't be proved in his criminal trial? Yes, I have heard the crap that evidence can be admitted into civil court that ma otherwise not be admitted in criminal court. But what is that evidence? More Mark Furman manufactured evidence? Remember how he took the 5th when asked about that?

As for evidence, I still think that the evidence they got, the morning Ron and Nicole found, should never have made it into the trial in the first place. O.J. and Nicole had been divorced for some time before she was killed. Yet Mr. Furman told the court that they went to O.J.'s house because they were in fear for HIS life because his EX-WIFE had been murdered. Someone PLEASE explain that concept to me! They were divorced, so I can't fathom why they would think he was in danger.

So, they go to his house, he has already left for Chicago, and get no response at the gate. Furman decides that they need to make sure he is dead or injured on the property. Yet shortly after they enter the property his daughter tells them that he is in Chicago. So why did they continue to search the property? The search should have stopped at that time. They were informed as to his whereabouts. All they had to do is make a quick phone call to determine if he was alive. I'm sure the man had a cell phone as well.

IMO they had no further business searching the property after they were told that he was out of town. If you want my opinion, Mark Furman did it! How else would he have so easily had evidence to "plant" at O.J.'s house? Personally I doubt that O.J. did it. If he did, he had to have help. Well there is the possibility that Kato did it too. He was in love with Nicole. Maybe he just couldn't stand seeing her with other men anymore. Anyway, O.J. was a wife beater, but I doubt that he is a killer.