Thread: ATI vs NVIDIA
View Single Post
Old 11-10-2004, 08:09 AM   #20 (permalink)
Sepht
 
is on the 6th circle: Heresy

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,665
Hellbux: 36,619


Send a message via AIM to Sepht Send a message via MSN to Sepht
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AndrewPMS1234@Nov 10 2004, 12:57 AM
Also the reviews have said that the 6800 are better than ATI, i hate ATI anyway its like i hated that S3 company and herkules company and 3dfx, i stick with the big names, and that is INTEL for processor, and Nvidia for graphics thats all you need.

Regards

Andrew
BS on the first Point.. out of the sites that Nvidia themselves listed for 6800 Reviews on initial release. Only 1 of the ones I checked(about 7-8) said the 6800 is better thne the X800. The X800 took the lead in all the others

In all D3d benchmarks that come out on VGA charts. the X800 Leads. also in OpenGL the X800 is catching up. X800 vs 6800 in Doom3? now in 3-5fps difference.. completely unnoticable.
ATi's X800XT holds the crown in performance.

AMD+ATi is the clearly stronger solution.

the AMD64 is on a completely different page in performance with all of its innovations.. whereas intel is just flat out slopppy with this release.

Toms, AnandTech. PCGamer. . Comparison of 100 GPUs by I dunno who. All proclaim the X800XT PE is the best. Give me some contridictory sources please? Because I sure as hell will give you more pro X800 if u want.

You seem to be a mix of all sorts of fanboys.
__________________

P4 Northwood 2.8Ghz 800Mhz FSB, i875P, 1.5gb DDR400, Radeon 9800(R350)
Aquamark3 Score: 47,825
Steam, Xfire: Sepht
You need at least 1 server (you know, the black ones) -Cowgoboom
Sepht do you take pride in making others Feel... How should i say this... Retarded? -Silent Archer

Sepht is offline   Reply With Quote