Quote:
Originally posted by GamesMaster@Nov 14 2004, 06:36 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if this BETA driver doesn't have specific optimisations for Half-Life 2. I haven't seen any official benchmarks, but my cs: source seems to run an awful lot better at 1280x1024 with AA and AF on.
Sepht... you got any info/benchies for us?
|
Couldn't find anything from a credable site. Checked out some Driver-based forums and found this much.
Seems to be along the lines of Kinda like the Aquamark and 3DMark05 boost in 4.11(
http://rage3d.de/catalyst_vergleich_eng_p3.php http://rage3d.de/catalyst_vergleich_eng_p4.php ), or the doom boost since the 4.6.
Anyway:
(NGO Crew)
Counter-Strike Source benchmarks (HL2 engine)
highest quality - no AA/AF - R9800XT - DX9c
4.11beta tweaked as hell:93fps
4.12beta without any modification:98fps
4.12beta with secondary adapter disabled and tweaks:108fps
(SuperBORG)
4.11
VST
1600 0af 0aa 111fps
1600 16af 6aa 87fps
4.12b
VST
1600 0af 0aa 121fps
1600 16af 6aa 93fps
(Evil-a!pha)
Valve Stress Test every thing is on max quality, max af, max aa, reflect all
4.11 = 84.68
4.12 = 96.38
3dmark05
4.11 = 4282
4.12 = 4564
(another-user)
i ran the stress test at 1024x768, 6xaa/16xaf, highest quality, reflect all
8.07 betas - 89.42fps
4.12 betas - 103.35fps
14fps increase, i can definatly live with that.
(footsteps)
HL2 stress test jumped by 10fps (relative to 8.07 betas) at 1280x1204 with 8xAF no AA, all settings high. And the specular bug is goooooooooooone!
A lot of people seem to feel noticable improvements. So its probably decent. My guess would be in the range of up to 10-25%(or FPS, either way, at around 100 FPS theres not much difference between % and FPS)
Some people are reporting some bug fixs, however (a few selective few) have said the issues aren't fixed and that they have worse performance in things such as Aquamark3(no note on HL2 though). Seems to be an upgrade.. but there have been a few issues with flashing in HL2 on X800 Pros w/ the 4.12b. So try them.. see if your fine(should notice better performance) but they are betas so keep that at the back of your mind.
All i could find. You can expect Rage3D.de to update that article once they can benchmark it. So keep your eye on
http://rage3d.de/catalyst_vergleich_eng_p1.php
In general: People are calling it the best release ever.. some have some issues, but since its a beta driver that can be expected. Noticable(not just benchmarkable, but actually in-game noticable) performance increase in HL2 and 3DMark05. AquaMark might do lower, but im not sure. Again, there are no official-ish benchmarks that I could find.. but these forum posts seem pretty consistant.
I don't have anything on 4.12b myself. But I can tell u that these 4.11s are very nice.. fixed the CoD issue in 4.10, performance in AQM3 and 3DMark05 surged about 3,000 and 300 points respetivally. and the 256meg allocation bug was fixed (to 46K(from 43K) and from 2116 to 2454)
And you can't forget the surges brought on by 4.10(cat AI and just normal improvments)
4.10 seemed to be the innovate release
4.11 the stablize release
4.12b push scores even higher. Fix minor bugs. STill a beta driver though.
(sorry ive been gone.. my internet died Thursday Night and I didn't get it back until this today.)