ATI r600 specs revealed

[SprigganX]

http://www.megagames.com/news/html/hardwar...srevealed.shtml (http://www.megagames.com/news/html/hardware/atir600specsrevealed.shtml)

65nm
64 Shader pipelines (Vec4+Scalar)
32 TMU's
32 ROPs
128 Shader Operations per Cycle
800MHz Core
102.4 billion shader ops/sec
512GFLOPs for the shaders
2 Billion triangles/sec
25.6 Gpixels/Gtexels/sec
256-bit 512MB 1.8GHz GDDR4 Memory
57.6 GB/sec Bandwidth (at 1.8GHz)
WGF2.0 Unified Shader

Maybe be true and may not be true, but if it is true, that is gonna be one badass card. :P :D

[KamisoriX]

LOL, we didn't even get the 520 yet. What comes next? News on the RX57345734?
it all sounds nice but what good is it if nonw of the chips ever see the light of days in our hands? :D

[SprigganX]

I guess ATI wants to be ahead of the competition.

[Silent Archer]

Isnt ATi always ahead of the Compitition.... :P :D :lol:

[Hasse]

Originally posted by Silent Archer@Jun 16 2005, 01:37 AM
Isnt ATi always ahead of the Compitition.... :P :D :lol:
They sure are!! :D :D

[H2DJmaster2005]

i'm more of an Nvidia fan even tho i have an ATI card...i just think Nvidia has better cards is all :P like i want to get their Nvidia GeForce 6800 Ultra :thumbup:

[Sepht]

Shame the X850XT is just as hard to find and performs better in nearly every damn benchmark..

Nvidia won this generation in every aspect except the highest end.
6800U<X850XT
6800U=<X800XT
6800GT>X800Pro
6600<X700
6600>X600
6200>X300

Plus better availablility, and more agressive price points(see: less expensive); and SLi&#39;s 6 month advance on Crossfire.

[pignuts]

thats BS. why make a card that would be so expensive to manufacture and for the end user to pay for , that wouldnt even be necessary for games to run on for at least 3-4 years.

[SprigganX]

because by next year there will be beautiful looking games out =P