NVIDIA does not want to show the rivals any exact performance figures of the NV35, but wants its partners and investors to realise that the forthcoming chip will definitely be a lot better than the current.
NVIDIA again has problems with achieving high frequencies of the graphics processor itself, or there are problems with the current revision of the PCB. Problems with the GPU are in general more likely than problems with PCB.
NV35-based graphics card were demonstrated behind the closed doors at CeBIT 2003 in Hannover, Germany.
NVIDIA set the core and memory frequencies of the GeForce FX 5800-based graphics card also at 250/500MHz
According to a German site, NV35 was able to render 110fps in Quake III Arena (demo 001) at 1600x1200 with 4x FSAA and 8x Anisotropic Filtering, while the NV30 only achieved 48fps in the benchmark. The Achilles’ hill of the current GeForce FX 5800 is its 128-bit bus, what seems to be the reason why the NV30 is outperformed by the NV35 that features 256-bit memory bus by roughly 130% in some cases. Since we have no information about performance scalability of the NV30 and NV35 graphics processors we can hardly draw a precise conclusion right now, however, I can state for sure that the NV35-based graphics cards will be a lot more powerful and efficient compared to the current NV30.
Will it be faster then the R350? time will tell...
|