Home | News | Downloads | GamersHell.com TV | Feedback | Casual Games | Forums
  PC Games Nintendo Wii Playstation 3 XBox 360 Playstation 2 Xbox Mobile PSP DS

Go Back   GamersHell.com Community Forums > GamersHell.com Community > GamersHell.com Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-21-2004, 03:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 325
Hellbux: 6,846
Default

what do you guys think the level of realism will reach in next gen and after, pc hardware and consoles, will they eventually make you part of the game itself, VR style, will it just get to the point where even the minutest detail is recreated like for a beach every single grain of sand with its own seperate physics model??

maybe not the graphics itself but the way you actually control it? will you use your brain as a direct controler to make your character do whatever you wish, run, walk, saunter, dance, or even scratch his scrot...mwahhahaha..lol

will the medium in which you see the game change? imo i think this is the major thing keeping back games and movies, no matter how good the graphics you will still be watching on a flat 2D medium...the TV, i think this needs to evolve, headsets like VR, or maybe a full 360 degree tv, you can look right around you (imagine that playing doom 3, you would be shitting yourself) or playing a racing game in car view, having to look at the wing mirrors and rear view, that would kick ass..

whats everyones view on the matter
__________________
Thesicness_inside_you is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 04:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
ddr
is on the 2nd circle: Lust
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ukraine(Lviv)
Posts: 246
Hellbux: 6,839
Send a message via ICQ to ddr Send a message via MSN to ddr
Default

Dont know
at this time we have what we have...maybe after some years
i will sit near BIG screen and giving max on WRC
dont know :francesco:
ddr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 05:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,033
Hellbux: 26,603
Send a message via AIM to Jdub22 Send a message via MSN to Jdub22
Default

i think individual grains of sand are not gonna happen. ever. closest thing would be some sort of illusion that appears to be grains, but will never be actual little grains in the game. there are many ways to make things appear more realistic than they really are such as bump mapping. you can look at a wall (in the game) and it may look like it's made of stone with little holes and ripples in it, but when youl ook at it from the side, it's perfectly flat. i'm sure more ways will be made to make things look more real, and save on poly count.
__________________
ASRock P43Twins1600
Intel Wolfdale E8400
OCZ Memory 4GB
NVIDIA GTX 260
WD 74GB RAPTOR 10K RPM HDD
WINDOWS VISTA
Jdub22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 07:42 AM   #4 (permalink)
is on the 6th circle: Heresy
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Östersund - Sweden
Posts: 2,899
Hellbux: 35,921
Default

I really don't know but the 360 degree TV would own!!
__________________
Hasse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 08:19 AM   #5 (permalink)
is on the 4th circle: Avarice & Prodigality
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Aussie
Posts: 998
Hellbux: 14,889
Default

i reckon anything could be done eventually with computers what i want is cheap good quality virtual reality (better than any big screen)

but then they'll bring out horror games much worse than doom 3 by then and very gory and detailed and we'll all be shiting ourselves... I CAN'T WAIT!
loserII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 08:45 AM   #6 (permalink)
Administrator
 
interman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,200
Hellbux: 102,767
Default

it's hard to say, but at least for quite a few more years the advancements will probably be in the video cards, not necessarily in VR, 360 degree TVs, etc. Real-time rendering has come a long way, especially looking at Unreal 3, but in terms of polygon processing it has a long way to go until it can be called photo-realistic.

During the next years we'll see even cheaper plasma and lcd screens, and the quality will improve. People want these because they take up less space, for one thing, and that's probably why 360 degree monitors will be a tough thing to sell. You could of course buy several plasma screens and have them around you, but it won't be cheap, and you'll have a hard time finding a game that's compatible. I'm sure some companies will try things like this, but it probably won't be for a few years - after plasma and such has become more common.
__________________
interman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 08:48 AM   #7 (permalink)
is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,033
Hellbux: 26,603
Send a message via AIM to Jdub22 Send a message via MSN to Jdub22
Default

i just can't see myself actually turning my head to look around for something in a game. I think it's more convenient to look with the mouse. besides, you can choose your mouse sensitivity s and i for one always have high so really i can turn around faster in a game than i could in real life and thus defeating the purpose of spending $2000 on 6 lcd monitors to surround myself with.
__________________
ASRock P43Twins1600
Intel Wolfdale E8400
OCZ Memory 4GB
NVIDIA GTX 260
WD 74GB RAPTOR 10K RPM HDD
WINDOWS VISTA
Jdub22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:28 AM   #8 (permalink)
is on the 2nd circle: Lust
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 126
Hellbux: 3,066
Default

this sounds ........matrix like.


i think thats probly 30 40 years from now not ten


but i like grafix as they are right now
__________________
bite my shiny metal ass-*bender*

mother you know they say life is like a box of choclates...but your life is more like a box of ACTIVE GRENADES!-*stewie*

were boned!...........-*bender*

hey do i preach to you when your lying in the gutter stoned NOOOOO......-*bender*

**slipknot--duality--**=king+rocking=best alive. do the math
striker_321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:59 AM   #9 (permalink)
Administrator
 
interman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,200
Hellbux: 102,767
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jdub22@Jun 21 2004, 07:48 AM
i just can't see myself actually turning my head to look around for something in a game. I think it's more convenient to look with the mouse. besides, you can choose your mouse sensitivity s and i for one always have high so really i can turn around faster in a game than i could in real life and thus defeating the purpose of spending $2000 on 6 lcd monitors to surround myself with.
the point is that it's supposed to be more life-like, in which case looking with a mouse would be less realistic than using your head. im not sure if i would want this in a "twitch shooter", but in for instance racing games it could be interesting
__________________
interman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Quick Links: PC Games | MAC Games | Playstation 2 | XBox | XBox 360 | Casual Games | Wii | Mobile | DS | GBA | Playstation 3 | GamersHell.com TV
Copyright © 1999-2009 GamersHell.com. All rights reserved. | Contact Page | E.U.L.A. | Advertise | Privacy Statement | Search (Top 100) | Link Us

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47