|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
is on the 1st circle: Limbo
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7
Hellbux: 422
|
Case in point, Shadow Ops: Red Mercury review by mr Jestin Jund. He spends the whole review blasting the game but gives it a very satisfactory 7.0 score. It doesn't seem very representative of the review's text, and there's little indication of why he decided to mark it only 1 point down from 8.0, a score GamersHell often gives out to titles they like very much. This is a small issue and fittingly I've chosen to be brief with regards to it. Thanks.
__________________
THE TIM-INATOR GAMING GOD Pentium I 133mhz, 48mb SDRAM, 512mb HDD, integerated 1MB S3 Trio64V graphics, Sound Blaster PCI128 sound card, CD-ROM drive, floppy disk drive. 14k dialup beyonce and christina stickers on side and partially on front of monitor. white sticky bits where ive tried to peel off some of them. eric cartman keyring sellotaped to the front. "get the hell outta here!!" - robert de niro |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Red Mercury is like BHD for poor people IMO. Graphics where like PS2 and gameplay wise it tried so hard to be BHD but fails in graphic and gameplay.
And just like in BHD the opposition is portrait as idiotic let-me-run-in-front-of-your-sight-and -stand-still mongos. I had mad fun with BHD back then (even the SP was entertaining) but RM is just an insult to my PCs HDD and myself as a Super Elite Pro gamer. Red mercury gets well deserved 4/10...j/k, it didn't deserved it. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|