|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
is on the 4th circle: Avarice & Prodigality
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 683
Hellbux: 10,318
|
Those are really old you know!
__________________
![]() ![]() Thank you GM for the awesome sig! For those who think the word "gray" doesn't exist *Bad Dude* Competition Winner June 2005! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,138
Hellbux: 14,565
|
The football screen is clearly fake, prolly some intro movie or such.
But the car image is highly possible, if you look closely you won't see anything unseen already in terms of technology. It's just the amount of detail that is so great. Just look at the trees, these are "just" sprites, and hell of a lot of em, but it's just sprites. A similiar thing to those tree shadows was already in RD2. Reflections and glare are also only existing technology pushed in detail. EDIT: The only question is: will they really support such detail in real time?
__________________
\"Of course this thread is pointless...but heck, we have to post something somewhere \" -KamisoriX Ratzinger - Die neue Panzerkampfwagen Papa ;) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 277
Hellbux: 5,724
|
The car image bores me. I mean, how real do you want it? Look at Grayfox's sig - it looks as good as that and that's a current game. As for the football one, I'd say that that is possible with tomorrows tech. That's more like it. I mean, look at the jump between ps1 to, say, Xbox. Anyway, you want your games to look like a game and not too real. It's the ideas that I'm more concerned about, because lately I ain't too fussed on games these days, with a few exceptions of course.
__________________
God invented whiskey so that the Irish wouldn't take over the world |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
What do you mean by "i doubt ps3 will be good again". If you compare every aspect of PS2 and Xbox, PS2 would win by 2% Xbox 48% and PS2 52% or even greater. Remember graphics aren't everything. Those screenshots of PS3 are not in game images. Its possible to have high quality objects in a game but you need a good graphic card and a good processor, thats why Sony created the "Cell" processor and made a deal with Nvidia. If you think gready Microsoft archive more then Sony, then you probably are wrong. I can be wrong but i was never disappointed by Sony, on the other hand we have microsoft. That one word "Microsoft" says a lot of things.
__________________
Why do people kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
im not quite excited about game promises in any way, after HL2 and Halo 2. just because they promise alot, but don't live up to them later.
im curious to the xbox2 anyway, hope it has cool features. ps2 doesn't really give me a hot nose or something...
__________________
![]() 'Because the finding of this, finds you incapacitorially finding and/or locating in your discovering the detecting of a way to save your dolly belle ol' what's her face.' - Captain Jack Sparrow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Without a doubt, the PS3 will be
A, A Monster in terms of Specs, And B, A Very successful Console. What Sony have done is, get as many Software houses to make games for the PS series as possible, this has maximised the games on the shop shelves. Granted 2/3 games are a pile of poo, but it gives the gamer the choice to buy that poo if they want to Look at the NGC, this console is a good console, but it has hardly any Developer support, hence less games on shelf and less choice It seems that Sony will carry on the tradition of quality marking any crap to boost software count, but it seems to draw the gamers in their droves..... and you do get the odd quality title that blows us all away ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|