|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Quote:
Oblivion Lost Aaah crap
__________________
''Its rider was named Death, and Hell followed close behind him.'' |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
|
is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,198
Hellbux: 16,321
|
crapalicious ! 1!! 11! 11 ! :rant:
DukeNukem will prolly hit the shelves b4 tis damn game eva does...!
__________________
Did ne1 find the sniperrifle in DOOM III...? -----------------------------------------------------------------
![]() ©®™ Respect 2 Xpendable --------------------------------------- PC Specs: Firefox
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,028
Hellbux: 14,492
|
Quote:
I'ts much better to say "when it's done", giving the developers more time to make it bug free and a superb game.
__________________
![]() AquaMark3 score: 25,495 cpu :5,956 gfx:3,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
fiscal Q4 is like real life Q3? I don't know whether Take 2, EA or THQ do this.
![]()
__________________
AMD Athlon XP 2600+ (Barton) /1024 MB DDR Ram - 400 Mhz - used 333 Mhz (Twinmos) / MSI K7N2 Delta ILSR (Nforce 2 Ultra 400) / Asus 6800 LE @ 16 Pipes / 160 GB HDD (Samsung, 8 MB Cache) | 507 user of gamershell.com ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
is on the 2nd circle: Lust
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: England
Posts: 234
Hellbux: 4,307
|
Wtf..? how come its been pushed back so far, last time i ever checked up on this game is was ment to be coming out in Q4 2004 then got pushed back till march or some time but Q4 2005? they must have deleted half the game or are adding somthing big...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||
|
is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,198
Hellbux: 16,321
|
- - RANT STARTING - -
Tis is just wrong from the get go, I mean pushing a game back and addin or improvin stuff I can comprehend, but 4 a whole year is just wrong...! The developers should have pointed out from the bginnin Q4 2005 instead of tis crap... I'm sure a lot of u will say what does it matter...hell it matters a lot when ur a gamer and u want tis game 2 rule, but at the same time want it as quickly as possible...If the release date would have been Q4 2005 from the bginnin, no1 in there right mind would have had ne hopes 4 tis game 2 emerge sooner than that. Now a lot of peepz have had hopes of playin tis game in Q4 2004 - Q2 2005, wich is just bad 4 business...VERY BAD... :dennis: :rant: - - RANT ENDING - -
__________________
Did ne1 find the sniperrifle in DOOM III...? -----------------------------------------------------------------
![]() ©®™ Respect 2 Xpendable --------------------------------------- PC Specs: Firefox
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,028
Hellbux: 14,492
|
You need to understand that all major games worked on for years. (HL2, Doom3, Max Payne 2 ...and many movies as well)
The longer the time they get, the better the game will come out, you can see many examples of games being far too early released for their time, and the outcome is rubbish. Hold on to your expectations, instead you should be happy that STALKER will be released with MP at all, and DX 9 rendering option if it wasn't the delay in 2004 to push the game forward. Don't blame the company for your early expectations.
__________________
![]() AquaMark3 score: 25,495 cpu :5,956 gfx:3,242 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|