ATI r600 specs revealed

SprigganX · 06-15-2005, 09:06 PM

http://www.megagames.com/news/html/hardwar...srevealed.shtml

65nm
64 Shader pipelines (Vec4+Scalar)
32 TMU's
32 ROPs
128 Shader Operations per Cycle
800MHz Core
102.4 billion shader ops/sec
512GFLOPs for the shaders
2 Billion triangles/sec
25.6 Gpixels/Gtexels/sec
256-bit 512MB 1.8GHz GDDR4 Memory
57.6 GB/sec Bandwidth (at 1.8GHz)
WGF2.0 Unified Shader

Maybe be true and may not be true, but if it is true, that is gonna be one badass card. :P

KamisoriX · 06-15-2005, 09:40 PM

LOL, we didn't even get the 520 yet. What comes next? News on the RX57345734?
it all sounds nice but what good is it if nonw of the chips ever see the light of days in our hands?

SprigganX · 06-15-2005, 11:50 PM

I guess ATI wants to be ahead of the competition.

Silent Archer · 06-16-2005, 12:37 AM

Isnt ATi always ahead of the Compitition.... :P

Hasse · 06-16-2005, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Silent Archer@Jun 16 2005, 01:37 AM
Isnt ATi always ahead of the Compitition.... :P

They sure are!!

H2DJmaster2005 · 06-22-2005, 01:57 AM

i'm more of an Nvidia fan even tho i have an ATI card...i just think Nvidia has better cards is all :P like i want to get their Nvidia GeForce 6800 Ultra :thumbup:

Sepht · 06-22-2005, 03:53 AM

Shame the X850XT is just as hard to find and performs better in nearly every damn benchmark..

Nvidia won this generation in every aspect except the highest end.
6800U<X850XT
6800U=<X800XT
6800GT>X800Pro
6600<X700
6600>X600
6200>X300

Plus better availablility, and more agressive price points(see: less expensive); and SLi's 6 month advance on Crossfire.

pignuts · 06-22-2005, 04:55 AM

thats BS. why make a card that would be so expensive to manufacture and for the end user to pay for , that wouldnt even be necessary for games to run on for at least 3-4 years.

SprigganX · 06-24-2005, 07:40 PM

because by next year there will be beautiful looking games out =P

06-15-2005, 09:06 PM	#1 (permalink)
SprigganX is on the 4th circle: Avarice & Prodigality Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 987 Hellbux: 13,744	http://www.megagames.com/news/html/hardwar...srevealed.shtml 65nm 64 Shader pipelines (Vec4+Scalar) 32 TMU's 32 ROPs 128 Shader Operations per Cycle 800MHz Core 102.4 billion shader ops/sec 512GFLOPs for the shaders 2 Billion triangles/sec 25.6 Gpixels/Gtexels/sec 256-bit 512MB 1.8GHz GDDR4 Memory 57.6 GB/sec Bandwidth (at 1.8GHz) WGF2.0 Unified Shader Maybe be true and may not be true, but if it is true, that is gonna be one badass card. :P __________________ Official {TwK} video Join at the Tweakguides forums.

06-15-2005, 09:40 PM	#2 (permalink)
KamisoriX is a certified SPAM DEMON. Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Sexyman Island Posts: 10,517 Hellbux: 184,142	LOL, we didn't even get the 520 yet. What comes next? News on the RX57345734? it all sounds nice but what good is it if nonw of the chips ever see the light of days in our hands? __________________ 01001011011000010110110101101001011100110110111101 11001001101001010110000010000001010010010101010100 110001011010

06-15-2005, 11:50 PM	#3 (permalink)
SprigganX is on the 4th circle: Avarice & Prodigality Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 987 Hellbux: 13,744	I guess ATI wants to be ahead of the competition. __________________ Official {TwK} video Join at the Tweakguides forums.

06-16-2005, 12:37 AM	#4 (permalink)
Silent Archer is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 469 Hellbux: 7,290	Isnt ATi always ahead of the Compitition.... :P __________________ - MSI 865G Neo2 - P4 Prescott 3.2Ghz @ 3.46Ghz 800Mhz FSB 1mb L2 Cache - 1.5 gig Corsair Platinum Twinx XMS Dual Channel Ram, Latency 2-2-2-5 @ 2.8V - ATi Radeon x800XL 256mb AGP @ Stock Speeds - 6.8 Catalyst - SB Audigy 2 ZS Gamer LE 7.1 24-bit Audio Processor

06-22-2005, 03:53 AM	#7 (permalink)
Sepht is on the 6th circle: Heresy Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 2,665 Hellbux: 36,654	Shame the X850XT is just as hard to find and performs better in nearly every damn benchmark.. Nvidia won this generation in every aspect except the highest end. 6800U<X850XT 6800U=<X800XT 6800GT>X800Pro 6600<X700 6600>X600 6200>X300 Plus better availablility, and more agressive price points(see: less expensive); and SLi's 6 month advance on Crossfire. __________________ P4 Northwood 2.8Ghz 800Mhz FSB, i875P, 1.5gb DDR400, Radeon 9800(R350) Aquamark3 Score: 47,825 Steam, Xfire: Sepht You need at least 1 server (you know, the black ones) -Cowgoboom Sepht do you take pride in making others Feel... How should i say this... Retarded? -Silent Archer

06-22-2005, 01:57 AM	#6 (permalink)
H2DJmaster2005 is on the 1st circle: Limbo Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 6 Hellbux: 390	i'm more of an Nvidia fan even tho i have an ATI card...i just think Nvidia has better cards is all :P like i want to get their Nvidia GeForce 6800 Ultra :thumbup:

06-22-2005, 04:55 AM	#8 (permalink)
pignuts is on the 1st circle: Limbo Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 40 Hellbux: 758	thats BS. why make a card that would be so expensive to manufacture and for the end user to pay for , that wouldnt even be necessary for games to run on for at least 3-4 years. __________________

06-24-2005, 07:40 PM	#9 (permalink)
SprigganX is on the 4th circle: Avarice & Prodigality Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 987 Hellbux: 13,744	because by next year there will be beautiful looking games out =P __________________ Official {TwK} video Join at the Tweakguides forums.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode