|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 264
Hellbux: 5,760
|
Downloading em now
ATI.COM CATALYST 5.7 RELEASE NOTES Performance Improvements worth noting Enhancements to our driver's internal memory management bring significant benefits to 64MB and 128MB framebuffer configurations in Catalyst™ 5.7. The resulting performance gains are most apparent in high resolution, everything on modes, when running applications that use a significant amount of graphics memory. Examples include: 5-15% gains in 3DMark05 on some products 20-60% gain in Far Cry Regulator across multiple settings 25-60% gains in Half-Life 2 at 1600x1200 4xAA 8xAF 40-60% gains in UT2004 at 1600x1200 6xAA 16xAF 50-100% improvement in Comanche4 at 1600x1200 6xAA 16xAF 50-200% gains in certain ShaderMark tests at high resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 264
Hellbux: 5,760
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
is on the 4th circle: Avarice & Prodigality
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 722
Hellbux: 9,883
|
The 5.7 drivers SUCK ASS. I was using them yesterday, playing HL2, CSS, UT2004, BF2 Demo, and I noticed SIGNIFICANT fps reduction from the previous 5.6 Omega drivers. I reverted back to them now, they are MUCH MUCH better. Stick with the Omega 5.6 till Omega 5.7 is what I say. GL ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 264
Hellbux: 5,760
|
Quote:
Either stick with cat 5.6 or even better(as matreox pointed out)grab omega 5.6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
is on the 1st circle: Limbo
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1
Hellbux: 215
|
I might not just be me, but these 5.7s blow. the FSAA visual quality is butchered. 4X looks worse than 2X did with the 5.6s. Anyone else having this issue?
p.s. i like the "where's my diaper" in the avatar. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|