Upgrading to SATA150

Skirmish · 03-22-2006, 03:57 PM

I had heard that I could gain load performance for games like BF2 and the like by getting a new SATA150 drive and installing the game onto that drive.

My question is do I have to have both Windows AND the game installed on that drive to realize the performance/load time improvement, or can I just install the SATA150 drive as like drive F: and keep Windows on C: drive? (Western digital 7200 RPM IDE100) Do these games load into memory or the pagefile?

Currently, I have it set up as F: drive, with windows on C: and the pagefile set to another partition on the SATA drive (no pagefile on C

, and I don't see a difference in the load time for BF2. (20-30 seconds when joining a server) This is why I ask if both Windows and the game need to be on the same drive to realize a faster load time.

Here's my rig:
ABIT NF7-S Mobo
AMD barton 2500 (OC'd to 3200 - 2.21ghz)
1.5GB dual channel Corsair Memory
ATI x800 video (overclocked to 490 core, 530 memory)
Audigy 2ZS sound
Western Digital IDE100 80gb
Western Digital Caviar SE SATA150

BF2 runs beautiful on the highest settings, but I was looking to cut down the load time.... Maybe I need to go RAID 0 with a set of SATA150 drives?

Thanks for any guidance.....

03-22-2006, 04:08 PM

Tbh, I have doubts whether it will speed your loading times up that fast, its not a huge step up. I havent gotten any noticable speed up in loading personally (going from a 40gb IDE to a Seagate 80gb SATA Baracuda).

If I were you I'd reformat, install the SATA drivers and then install WinXp on your new SATA HD. I'd reccommend keeping your IDE HD as just a backup / storage drive.

mendel · 03-22-2006, 05:15 PM

a serial hd (what you do with raid 0) will always be faster than 1 regular hd
the data can be transferred twice as fast (theoretical)
so possibly it will reduce your loading-time

and for second
i think it's the best if you buy 2 hard-drives (or 3 when you use raid

)
1 for windows
2 for other stuff (gaming etc)

Skirmish · 03-22-2006, 05:37 PM

Thanks guys..... I appreciate the feedback....... and yeah.. I did some benchmarking here and the SATA150 didn't score a whole lot higher than my IDE100. Perhaps taking 2 SATAs and raiding them would result in a bigger jump.... I'd love to do 3 SATAs and RAID them with checking and all, but I guess I'm not that obessive about it... hahhahha....

But I appreciate the help....

03-22-2006, 03:57 PM	#1 (permalink)
Skirmish is on the 1st circle: Limbo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 3 Hellbux: 12	I had heard that I could gain load performance for games like BF2 and the like by getting a new SATA150 drive and installing the game onto that drive. My question is do I have to have both Windows AND the game installed on that drive to realize the performance/load time improvement, or can I just install the SATA150 drive as like drive F: and keep Windows on C: drive? (Western digital 7200 RPM IDE100) Do these games load into memory or the pagefile? Currently, I have it set up as F: drive, with windows on C: and the pagefile set to another partition on the SATA drive (no pagefile on C, and I don't see a difference in the load time for BF2. (20-30 seconds when joining a server) This is why I ask if both Windows and the game need to be on the same drive to realize a faster load time. Here's my rig: ABIT NF7-S Mobo AMD barton 2500 (OC'd to 3200 - 2.21ghz) 1.5GB dual channel Corsair Memory ATI x800 video (overclocked to 490 core, 530 memory) Audigy 2ZS sound Western Digital IDE100 80gb Western Digital Caviar SE SATA150 BF2 runs beautiful on the highest settings, but I was looking to cut down the load time.... Maybe I need to go RAID 0 with a set of SATA150 drives? Thanks for any guidance.....

03-22-2006, 05:15 PM	#3 (permalink)
mendel is on the 4th circle: Avarice & Prodigality Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: BELGIUM Posts: 541 Hellbux: 11,010	a serial hd (what you do with raid 0) will always be faster than 1 regular hd the data can be transferred twice as fast (theoretical) so possibly it will reduce your loading-time and for second i think it's the best if you buy 2 hard-drives (or 3 when you use raid ) 1 for windows 2 for other stuff (gaming etc) __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-22-2006, 04:08 PM	#2 (permalink)
64705 is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,425 Hellbux: 12,888	Tbh, I have doubts whether it will speed your loading times up that fast, its not a huge step up. I havent gotten any noticable speed up in loading personally (going from a 40gb IDE to a Seagate 80gb SATA Baracuda). If I were you I'd reformat, install the SATA drivers and then install WinXp on your new SATA HD. I'd reccommend keeping your IDE HD as just a backup / storage drive.

03-22-2006, 05:37 PM	#4 (permalink)
Skirmish is on the 1st circle: Limbo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 3 Hellbux: 12	Thanks guys..... I appreciate the feedback....... and yeah.. I did some benchmarking here and the SATA150 didn't score a whole lot higher than my IDE100. Perhaps taking 2 SATAs and raiding them would result in a bigger jump.... I'd love to do 3 SATAs and RAID them with checking and all, but I guess I'm not that obessive about it... hahhahha.... But I appreciate the help....