|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Well, buying the 1950 pro would be like buying the 360, a fair and decent system that can keep you happy but without any real nextgen features. The 8800 would be the PS3
![]()
__________________
![]() Littlebigplanet is going to be the best selling game this year because I say so, and I am always right. PSN name: Gazz1979 (feel free to add me) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
You shouldn't have taken that literally. The overall package of the PS3 could be compared to the 8800, it specific compound can't. The 1950 is ofcourse nowhere near the 360 but as an package it's performancewise the best comparison. Both next gen consoles have a unified shader structure (the most important part of dx10 to those readers who don't know what it is, google the rest for yourself).
__________________
![]() Littlebigplanet is going to be the best selling game this year because I say so, and I am always right. PSN name: Gazz1979 (feel free to add me) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Hellmouth
Posts: 833
Hellbux: 14,804
|
Well if you have an AGP system then the 7800GS is the way to go. I have
one in my old gaming PC. It kick's ass. I've also noted some posts about the core 2 duo vs. the AM2. There is no contest here. Core2 Duo is the only smart choice. And as for DX10. I don't see it happening anytime really soon. In 6 month's we'll see a few games, but I don't think it's going to be happening anytime real soon. I think it will be a lot longer wait then the switch from DX8 to 9. And even though I can afford a DX10 card I'm not gonna buy the 8800 series from Nvidia. I'll wait til the next generation comes out. It will be improved by then and we'll have some games to play :-)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Hellmouth
Posts: 833
Hellbux: 14,804
|
Quote:
from CPU to Power Supply. There is a lot of good help available here. But without all the info were all just really guesstimating :-)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Well, I completely disagree. It's nice to see some people with a passion for the latest hardware, but we must accept the fact that some people are on a lower budget. A difference of 80-90 euro's between the basic x2/core2duo is huge and means people with a budget will have to compromize on the quality of the rest of their setup, for example their hd, psu mem, mobo (even more impotant then CPU) or whatever.
Just suggesting the biggest processor is a way too narrowminded vision in the pcworld. The overall performance of a pc is based on the sum of it's contents and not on just a core2duo. Any link supporting your claim GM? Not that it suddendly makes the 360 faster as it still is the slower of the 2 but I'm intriged.
__________________
![]() Littlebigplanet is going to be the best selling game this year because I say so, and I am always right. PSN name: Gazz1979 (feel free to add me) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Hellmouth
Posts: 833
Hellbux: 14,804
|
Quote:
is easy. The C2D E6300 is cheap. And it dominates the AMD in almost every test available. Recommending a AMD is only good for fanboys and the truely poor. If your poor then you just need to save your cash a little longer. The prices drop every day. And with the addition of a decent aftermarket heatsink the E6300 will perfom almost as good as it's $500 brother. Nothing you can do will make the AMD equal to the C2D. My last system had an 4800X2 and the E6300 blows it out of the water. I paid $800 for the X2 (at the time, what is it now). You can get the E6300 for under $200 US.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|