|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
stop arguing.
If those are ur choices, forget the crap about 'generations' X300 is a budget card, 9600 is a mainstream card. Technical 'stats' are utterly pointless at times. This is one of those times. http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2281&p=5 Its not an arguable position. the X300 is nowhere near the 9600 in performance. Its a different level. as for the 9600 normal and Pro? Ill let u guys figure it out. (Also, you might want to try to get it from a 3rd party(HIS, Powercolor, Saphire, they are nearly ALWAYS better in performance(the other aspects? such as build quality? no clue)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
is on the 1st circle: Limbo
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1
Hellbux: 315
|
dont wanna be rude or n e thing but why only get a 9600? i assume ur earning from a full time job
im 17 with only a part time job, and i still have to pay for stuff contributions to the house etc ..... and i just upgraded my pc in one go from a mid end pc i had b4.....now it never has to be upgraded again for another 2-3 years maybe longer ( that is if there isnt some huge graphics card leap that spawns some kind of insane mega graphics card that will end all graphics cards forever) specs r pentium 4 3.5ghz x800pro 256meg 2 gig of ddr ram two 120 gig hard drives few other things like top notch power supply duel layer dvd drive good quality case also i hafta pay college travel and materials and stuff and i only get say £80-£100 a week....depending on how many hours im put down for so y is it that the people who can afford it buy low end teahat stuff? sorry again it just puzzles me now im probably gonna get moaned at ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|