New AMD N-Bench 3.1

Originally posted by Cowgoboom@Feb 19 2005, 02:43 PM
Find it odd how I got a better score than AK, whilst he has the EXACT same proc, and a much better video card...maybe it's the ram thats killin you guys!

LOL what the hell is THAT guy talking about?!?!!? :hug: :hug: :hug:

This is what I got:



My specs are Athlon XP 3200+@2,313 GHz, 1024 mb DDR 400, Asus 9800XT

I got 3069 just now, but I got 32xx last night I am sure of it...

Anyways, I have AMD Athlon64 3400+ (@2448MHz), 1Gb DDR400 (CAS2.5), ATI x800Pro VIVO (XT PE BIOS and clock).

N-Bench Ver 3.1 Results File

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Info]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005/02/23 01:12:31
0114466700

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[System]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processor Type Intel® Pentium® 4 Mobile CPU 1.60GHz
Processor Speed 1.587 GHz
Free Memory 114396 KB
Total Memory 261100 KB
Display Adapter ATI MOBILITY RADEON 7500 (Omega 2.6.05a)
Free VRAM 29524 KB
Operating System Windows XP 5.01.2600
DirectX Version DirectX 9

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Extensions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MMX Yes
SSE Yes
SSE2 Yes
3DNow! No
Enhanced 3DNow! No
3DNow! Professional No

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Options]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Benchmark Options>
Continuous Loop No
BGM Enable No
Protect Mode No
Challenge Mode No
3D Benchmark Tests Yes
CPU Benchmark Tests Yes

<Benchmark Tests>
Integer 1 (Landscape) Yes
Integer 2 (Mandelbrot) Yes
Float 1 (Flock) Yes
Float 2 (Rigid Body) Yes
Ninja 1 Yes
Ninja 2 Yes
Grand Touring Yes
Star Fighter Yes

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[CPU Benchmark Score]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Integer 1 (Landscape)>
N-Bench Score 1093 Marks
FPS Average n/a
Total Polygon Count n/a
Total Texture Size n/a

<Integer 2 (Mandelbrot)>
N-Bench Score 684 Marks
FPS Average n/a
Total Polygon Count n/a
Total Texture Size n/a

<Float 1 (Flock)>
N-Bench Score 1031 Marks
FPS Average n/a
Total Polygon Count n/a
Total Texture Size n/a

<Float 2 (Rigid Body)>
N-Bench Score 899 Marks
FPS Average n/a
Total Polygon Count n/a
Total Texture Size n/a

<CPU Overall>
N-Bench Score 926 Marks
FPS Average n/a

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[3D Benchmark Score]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Ninja 1>
N-Bench Score 938 Marks
FPS Average 12.93 FPS
Total Polygon Count 30088 Counts
Total Texture Size 18.4 MB

<Ninja 2>
N-Bench Score 1074 Marks
FPS Average 18.90 FPS
Total Polygon Count 46254 Counts
Total Texture Size 21.9 MB

<Grand Touring>
N-Bench Score 805 Marks
FPS Average 12.06 FPS
Total Polygon Count 86274 Counts
Total Texture Size 16.8 MB

<Star Fighter>
N-Bench Score 234 Marks
FPS Average 11.52 FPS
Total Polygon Count 99502 Counts
Total Texture Size 29.6 MB

<3D Overall>
N-Bench Score 762 Marks
FPS Average 13.85 FPS

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Overall Score]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N-Bench Score 844 Marks
FPS Average 13.85 FPS

Originally posted by BLACK KNIGHT@Feb 19 2005, 09:37 PM
Hmmm i definatly though my computer was better than this. Could it be wrong since its for AMD and im using intel?

that is most definatly the issue.
This benchmark goes out of its way to support AMD's extensions. i got just under 2000.

Yep, great for AMD owners

No, more like a useless waste of resources.

Its like using ATi's HL2 demos to compare HL2's graphics performance.