Login
Search

Welcome to the GamersHell.com forums Register today!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2005, 07:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 317
Hellbux: 8,887


Default

tHIS IS BIG!

A company called AGEIA, which normaly dealing with networking Hardware, has developed a chip to to co-process physic with the CPU. the Physics chip (PPU or Physics processing unt) is called PHYSX. this PPU cames on its own board with its own GDDR3 RAM ( im hearing 128MB),works together with the CPU and GPU (or VPU...ATI fans) and uses an expansion slot
to connect to the system. no benchmarks are out yet but this add-on board increases gaming and other physics
based graphic programs dramaticaly. 100 time the physics proceesing then the CPU alone and i am not sure if this i true but
2 to 3 time the GPU preformance than with out the PPU. also EPIC games most notabley are working with this new tech and unreal 3 engine use this Physics tech.

here are some articles about this:

click here for more info

interview with PHYSX rep

DISCUSS!!
__________________
"IT IS WHAT IT IS"

AMD 64 3700+ * 2GB (4x512) HyperX DDR500 * DFI LANPARY EXPERT * 5x80 Barracuda SATA Raid5 * 2 BFG 7800GTs in SLI * HP DVD-RW 630e * Lite-on DVDrom x16 *
TheTeaPot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2005, 07:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,138
Hellbux: 14,672


Default

Sorry to disapoint you teapot but kami was faster with that : P
__________________
\"Of course this thread is pointless...but heck, we have to post something somewhere \" -KamisoriX
Ratzinger - Die neue Panzerkampfwagen Papa ;)
Kacperski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2005, 07:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 317
Hellbux: 8,887


Default

WHERE?
__________________
"IT IS WHAT IT IS"

AMD 64 3700+ * 2GB (4x512) HyperX DDR500 * DFI LANPARY EXPERT * 5x80 Barracuda SATA Raid5 * 2 BFG 7800GTs in SLI * HP DVD-RW 630e * Lite-on DVDrom x16 *
TheTeaPot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2005, 07:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
papajoe's Avatar
 
is on the 2nd circle: Lust

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 241
Hellbux: 5,365


Default

What is there to discuss about it? Let me see...PCI implementations would slow down your GPU and CPU (increased bus traffic in different directions). PCI-E implementation would halve you channel bandwidth. I'm still unsure what they mean by 'add-in card' they haven't given enough information for any logical conclusion. Until I have one in my lab, I can make no speculation.
papajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2005, 07:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
is on the 5th circle: Wrath & Sullenness

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,138
Hellbux: 14,672


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by TheTeaPot@May 6 2005, 03:19 PM
WHERE?
Too lazy to look myself, but there certainly was a topic bout that already
__________________
\"Of course this thread is pointless...but heck, we have to post something somewhere \" -KamisoriX
Ratzinger - Die neue Panzerkampfwagen Papa ;)
Kacperski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2005, 07:29 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 317
Hellbux: 8,887


Default

well i didnt find it, so oh well.
__________________
"IT IS WHAT IT IS"

AMD 64 3700+ * 2GB (4x512) HyperX DDR500 * DFI LANPARY EXPERT * 5x80 Barracuda SATA Raid5 * 2 BFG 7800GTs in SLI * HP DVD-RW 630e * Lite-on DVDrom x16 *
TheTeaPot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2005, 07:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 317
Hellbux: 8,887


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by papajoe@May 6 2005, 07:20 PM
What is there to discuss about it? Let me see...PCI implementations would slow down your GPU and CPU (increased bus traffic in different directions). PCI-E implementation would halve you channel bandwidth. I'm still unsure what they mean by 'add-in card' they haven't given enough information for any logical conclusion. Until I have one in my lab, I can make no speculation.
from what i have heard it will use a 4x pci-e. and what ever lanes are left on that bus it will use. there might be some balancing required on the bus, but iv read it increases performance of the CPU and GPU.

the add on on card connects to the Pci-e bus internaly only, so theres no plate to screw in or input/outputs of an sort.
__________________
"IT IS WHAT IT IS"

AMD 64 3700+ * 2GB (4x512) HyperX DDR500 * DFI LANPARY EXPERT * 5x80 Barracuda SATA Raid5 * 2 BFG 7800GTs in SLI * HP DVD-RW 630e * Lite-on DVDrom x16 *
TheTeaPot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2005, 09:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
KamisoriX's Avatar
 
is a certified SPAM DEMON.

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sexyman Island
Posts: 10,452
Hellbux: 181,371


Send a message via ICQ to KamisoriX Send a message via AIM to KamisoriX
Default

WOA, i posted it when Kac and i were still in grade school
__________________
01001011011000010110110101101001011100110110111101 11001001101001010110000010000001010010010101010100 110001011010
KamisoriX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 11:45 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
is on the 1st circle: Limbo

Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Posts: 5
Hellbux: 285


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by papajoe@May 6 2005, 07:20 PM
What is there to discuss about it?* Let me see...PCI implementations would slow down your GPU and CPU (increased bus traffic in different directions).* PCI-E implementation would halve you channel bandwidth.* I'm still unsure what they mean by 'add-in card'* they haven't given enough information for any logical conclusion.* Until I have one in my lab, I can make no speculation.
So you're implying that a physics hardware card isn't practical because it has to go through PCI?

So i guess you're right and the company developing the hardware is misguided then? That would also mean that the programmers behind Unreal engine 3 are also misguided. Perhaps you should contact them to explain why a physics hardware board won't bring any significant advantages?

You say you won't speculate until you have one in your "lab" but you're already speculating that the system won't be fast.

Even if physics processing was impractical via PCI... We would eventually see the design of new ports with sufficiant speed. But since there are PCI 3d cards then I have serious doubts about your statement anyway. The point of a physics chip is to perform complex physics calculations and free the CPU from that task. Even using a standard PCI slot would see a performance increase.
feathers632 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 02:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
papajoe's Avatar
 
is on the 2nd circle: Lust

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 241
Hellbux: 5,365


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by papajoe@May 6 2005, 07:20 PM
What is there to discuss about it? Let me see...PCI implementations would slow down your GPU and CPU (increased bus traffic in different directions). PCI-E implementation would halve you channel bandwidth. I'm still unsure what they mean by 'add-in card' they haven't given enough information for any logical conclusion. Until I have one in my lab, I can make no speculation.
Sorry for the above post, it wasn't me but a co-worker who thinks its cool to post with other peoples id's. Yes we work in a lab, but it doesn't change the fact he's an ass_hole. I like the part how he says it's going to halve your bandwidth but until he has one he can make no speculation.... derr.
papajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 AM.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77