|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Gamershell Grandpa
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Posts: 5,714
Hellbux: 100,648
|
8 AM CST, NASA lost contact with the shuttle with 7 astronauts aboard. One of them was the first Israeli to go into space.
There is video of it breaking up over Texas. Link
__________________
Papajoe r0ckz3rz!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||
|
I d like to see the movie, since i wasnt able to see it on TV here, although it was broadcasted.
Ofcourse its a sad event, nonetheless when you're in risky bussiness like Space-exploring certain things can happen and do. I dont feel sorry for anybody, its just a risk they were willing to take and they ended up at the bad-side of it. Maybe a little bit sympathy is on order for the next of kin, but thats all that is called for.
__________________
"Making any judgements from a snapshot intended for a non-interactive demo is ill advised"
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
is on the 6th circle: Heresy
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,690
Hellbux: 59,834
|
Don't know if you guys read /seen it, but...
a) This particular shuttle was having technical problems before the launch. b) It was 22 years old and was the oldest shuttle in the fleet. c) A now retired NASA employee wrote a personal letter to Jeorge W. Bush in which he warned about unreliability of current shuttles, and specifically the Columbia, while going into technical details. The letter was ignored, and he was warned not to create panic by NASA. d) On launch a piece of the rocket fell off, while hitting the 'nose' of the shuttle. NASA of course knew all that, yet still allowed the shuttle to land. So what's the conclusion? This thing was bound to happen sooner or later, with the shuttle being so old, having problems, and a NASA employee warning about possibility of it happening. The people responsible for it in NASA chose to ignore those warnings and risk the lives of other people. And after the shuttle was hit by a piece of the rocket on launch and got damaged, they SHOULD've let the crew stay on the international space station and send another shuttle to get them out of there, or at least ask the Russians to do it. Yet they ignored the risk once again, and let them attempt to land. So what's my point? I really think that those fatheads in NASA get money for getting people killed. I wish there'd be a thorough investigation into this, and people responsible would get punished / fired / jailed. But then again, I wish for lots of things, like world peace, and they never happen. Anyway, my condolences to the austonauts' families. And if I would believe in SOMETHING, I'd probably pray for them, except that I don't. But these men and women are the pioneers of space and I bow down to their courage and hope that they are allright, wherever they are now.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
is on the 3rd circle: Gluttony
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 435
Hellbux: 8,134
|
after seeing alot on the columbia, my conclusion is that the peice that fell off and struck the left wing, broke or fractured one or more of the heat resisting tiles, then upon re-entry, with the tile not there to protect it, the aluminum underneath started to melt therefor making a hole in the wing causing instability, eventually leading to the disaster.
what i dont understand is, nasa knew about the thing hitting the wing, why not while the columbia was up in space, assess the damage with a telescope?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||