Quote:
Originally posted by Bucky@Nov 3 2004, 10:50 PM
Bucky Said Something. Sepht Edited it out.
Ill throw a little Anti-kerry thing in here.
Kerry says he'll do this this and this. BUT HES BEEN A SENATOR FOR 20 F*cking years AND WTF HAS HE DONE? Why do you think no one knew who he was? he did nothing notable. Why should we belive he'll do it now.
I can't even argue that point.. because its so damn true..
|
The average voter is a lot less informed, and a lot more mislead then you would like to imagine.
Just because, you, people you know, and myself know something about whats happening, doesn't nearly apply to the rest of the country.
We need a conservative president. We don't need a *fake* conservative like bush, or a christian-based conservative(like bush).
I'm a consevative myself. However I do think that Kerry failed for 2 reasons. First, he doesn't have a former base outside Mass. Bush has a former term, governorship, and his father. Second. Kerry Let the Republicans define him. "flip-flopper" is a very interesting word. Sure he changed his mind. but over 20 years, new information has also surfaced. ADAPTING TO NEW INFORMATION IS NOT A BAD THING. Hell all politicitians do it, bush does it himself plenty. Does Bush put his foot down? not at all. He has yet to veto a single bill, where are his positions now? nowhere, he just signs anything. he isn't authroizing enough force in Iraq. If you take a country, you use (nearly) all tools you have to effectivally dispose of the enemy. Stop letting these Terrorists hid in the public and in mosques. Level anywhere were the terrorists hide. Make sure that if they want to use their own friends as cover, the US Soliders won't hesist to shoot you, or your friends. Bush hasn't done that.. hes been too politically correct.
You know what republicans are scare of? looking at Kerry for what hes worth.
Biggest concern in office? Same as bush
Gay Marrige? Same as bush
Flipflops? No more then bush. They aren't even a bad thing.
Abortion? Supports whatever the supreme court says
War Record? All Senators, the president himself, and just about every vet says that Kerry did nothing incorrect in Vietnam,
Iraq? More troops, kerry would have needed to worry about re-election, he would have to be agressive if he would have wanted to get re-elected.
Taxes? Same as before you got your 400 bucks.
Health-care? an option for people who can't afford it
Stem Cell Research? kerry would have allowed the use of storage embryotic cells.(The ones that were extracted but not used). Hell, either we use them.. or they get destroyed.. there is nothign wrong with using them then.
Budget? Same exact as bush, however much the democrats say otherwise. They both have no real plan.
Optomisitic Misinformation, and mistakes that affected millions of lives? Kerry doesn't have them.
Worrying that the US doesn't become this century's Soviet Union, disregarding the internation community? Kerry realizes it as a problem
Has a stupid movie maker supporting him? Yeh.. I guess thats a negative.. F*cking Michael moore.. I hate that sandpaper. hes a danger to the ignorance of america.
The canidates were really the same in most areas. Except Kerry would have had to be a little more conservative if he wanted a shot at re-election.
Kerry Lost, he fell victim to allowing the Reb. to define him.
Also.. Both canidates weren't very good. A lieing fake conservative with tons of mistakes. Or a recordless 20 year senator whose face is too long.
11-04-2004, 04:50 AM
Linear Mode
